the Guardian
December 13th, 2006
by Dave Stewart
Developer will attempt to answer
concerns about townhouse plans
APM Group wins city council approval for
waterfront brownstone project
A Charlottetown developer says he will
attempt to respond to the concerns of
residents when it comes to a proposed
townhouse development on the city's
waterfront.
Tim banks, president of APM,
cleared one major hurdle this week when
city council voted 9-1 in favour of
allowing his 36 unit brownstone project
- dubbed Harbour Square Townhouses - to
go ahead.
Pending any appeals before the Island
Regulatory and Appeals Commission, Banks
will be seeking a permit to begin
construction in late April.
A public meeting was held last week, a
chance for residents to see what APM is
proposing.
The land Banks wants to build on used to
be owned by Transport Canada and is now
in the hands of the Charlottetown
Harbour Authority which wants to have
paying customers on the vacant land in
order to finance other working parts of
the port.
At the meeting, Banks heard concerns and
is trying to address them. "A couple of
the neighbors felt... there should be
more consideration given to the facades
of the buildings, not to take away from
what we've proposed but to give them
some uniqueness," Banks said Tuesday
after learning about council's vote the
night before.
When Banks talks about the facade of his
buildings, he means that the three
buildings aren't necessarily going to
look identical.
"We've also proposed reconfiguring the
buildings a little bit to separate
them farther." That's in response to
concerns that the three buildings, which
were only supposed to be between 12 and
15 feet apart, would completely block
the view of the waterfront.
"We would actually shorten the length of
the building and deepen it a bit on the
two end buildings and that would help us
open up the sightlines between the
buildings."
Banks said he's not making any definite
promises on altering APM's original
proposal.
"If it's feasible to do that we believe
that it will bring more value to our
buildings in terms of practical and an
appearance point of view."
Coun. Bruce Garrity was the lone
councilor to oppose the project at
council's regular public monthly meeting
on Monday.
"I've been saying for the past five, six
years that I was hoping there would be a
moratorium on development on the
waterfront side (of Water Street)."
Garrity said. "That land belongs to all
of us. I vote no on where it is, not
what it is."
Deputy Mayor Stu MacFadyen said as long
as APM's proposal meets all the city's
bylaws he's fine with it.
Coun. Kim Devine, chair of planning and
development, said she's pleased to see
Banks responding to the concerns over
the project.
"I think it will address the concerns,"
Devine said. "We know this land will be
developed. (This project) ensures we
will have residents down there all the
time."
Coun. Mitchell Tweel said the city
should do residents on the waterfront a
big favour and put together a
comprehensive plan for the entire
waterfront rather than address each
project as it comes up.